Shocking Durham Filing Involving Coverup Operation

coverup

Freshly filed John Durham documents tweeted out by Catherine Herridge show traces of an illegal “coverup” operation run by the fraudulent Deep State department of “just us,” shielding their internal bureau of instigation from facing actual “justice.”

OIG coverup operation

The DOJ didn’t put the rats in charge of guarding the cheese this time. Instead, allegedly corrupt federal officials staked out a toothless watchdog to watch the rats heist the cheese. Inspector General Michael Horowitz.

It seems the FBI’s oversight regulator not only slept through the robbery, he buried all the evidence. He stuck it in a deep dark hole with every other bone falling out of the FBI’s closet. Durham has a clue and it looks a heck of a lot like a coverup operation.

As the tweet points out, this new Durham filing “reveals his team learned for first time, this month, the Office of the Inspector General had TWO cellphones for former FBI General Counsel.” It’s not a coverup, liberals insist. He simply didn’t bother to tell anyone.

That “former FBI” lawyer was none other than Jim Baker, the notorious “central witness” in Durham’s case against Michael Sussmann. Durham’s team has been frantically trying to break Baker’s raprods open since they surfaced. According to the paperwork, “the Government has been working diligently to review their contents.”

In just the last two weeks, the documents make crystal clear Durham wants to know how the Office of Inspector General could coverup crucial evidence ever since his probe started around two years or so ago.

As Conservative Treehouse notes, “specifically, the criminal case against Sussmann revolved around the central witness, the point of contact with former FBI General Counsel, Jim Baker. Yet the OIG said nothing to John Durham about their possession of Baker’s phones until this month?

A curious paragraph

Other analysts at TechnoFog soon underscored that there “is also a curious paragraph discussing the fact that Durham, in January 2022 – learned from the DOJ Inspector General that they possessed ‘two FBI cellphones of the former FBI General Counsel to whom the defendant made his alleged false statement, along with forensic reports analyzing those cellphones.’

So the Horowitz coverup shielded not just the phones, but the “forensic reports analyzing those cellphones.”

Durham also hinted to the Court that more bombshell evidence is on the way. There may be even more to the OIG coverup.

He swears under oath that “the Government expects to receive additional information and documents in the coming weeks that may be relevant to the charged conduct.”

The thing that has every analyst who watches the antics going on inside the beltway passing the story around is that “Baker telling Durham he gave his phones to the OIG, likely led to Durham asking DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz about them.” Coverup? What are you suggesting? “The OIG then recently admitting they had them…. as evidence… and so, here they are.”

The tricky part is this. “On its face the OIG not informing the Durham probe about them previously confirms” that “‘information silos‘ are used to contain and control information adverse to the interests of the DC system.” Ratholing things like these two phones, becomes “a feature, not a flaw.” Compartmentalization “is how the corrupt enterprises of the Fourth Branch of Government, in this instance the DOJ, can bury information.” It goes like this. “Why didn’t you tell us you had the murder weapon? Well, you didn’t ask.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts