Please, John Ratcliffe urges the judge who will be signing off on Hunter Biden’s plea deal, consider the evidence carefully before granting approval. All the evidence, especially the things which the public recently became aware of. Thanks to brave IRS whistleblowers. Ratcliffe isn’t just anybody. Not only was he one of the few intelligence directors in recent memory who actually has some real intelligence, Ratcliffe also served as a U.S. Attorney. Exactly the same as David Weiss, the “prosecutor” who’s letting Biden off the hook, on everything he ever did or even thinks of doing, with two years on probation and a drug diversion program.
Up to the judge
It’s all up to the judge, but the court has a duty to weigh all the evidence before closing a criminal case. Especially, one as important as this. On Sunday, John Ratcliffe sat down with Trey Gowdy over at the Fox studios to talk about the sweetheart deal of the century handed to Hunter Biden on a silver platter.
Delaware U.S. Attorney David Weiss happily offered to let Hunter “plead guilty to two misdemeanor tax counts and a gun charge.” Ratcliffe notes that leaves a few questions about “Attorney General Merrick Garland’s Justice Department’s handling of the case.” He’s not alone in making that observation.
Another well respected conservative pundit, law professor Jonathan Turley, went into graphically specific detail about the way someone is lying. Either two career IRS agents turned whistleblower, who worked on the case, or Merrick Garland. If it’s Garland, the nation is in serious jeopardy. Weiss allegedly told the whole team that “I’m not the deciding official.” The team took notes.
Former DNI John Ratcliffe urges judge not to accept Hunter Biden plea deal https://t.co/LVard1pXrS
— Fox News (@FoxNews) June 26, 2023
The judge certainly has a lot to look into. As former DNI Ratcliffe points out, this case has been dragging on for far too long. When it results in such lenient charges, something doesn’t add up.
“Failing to pay taxes on time and lying on an application to purchase a gun are not complicated. On the tax counts, you literally just need a calendar and a question: Did you pay your taxes by this date? On the gun charge. It’s one question: Did you lie on the application to buy a gun? If you were really lazy, it might take five weeks, but if you’re the president’s son, it takes much longer, why?”
Those are questions which the judge needs to have answered before he seals the diabolical pact.
More serious charges
Former South Carolina lawmaker Trey Gowdy was also a federal prosecutor. He noted that “the case’s length of five years might raise eyebrows about whether more serious charges were contemplated and then rejected.” Americans wonder that as well. Things like bribery, money laundering, influence peddling or espionage. The judge needs to make sure they were properly investigated. Gowdy also “expressed concerns about whether Hunter was treated better or worse than others facing similar charges.” There seems to be a huge difference between the way they help Democrats break the laws while breaking the laws themselves to frame an innocent Donald Trump, simply to prevent him from exposing their corruption.
“How can [Garland] reconcile the treatment of two presidential candidates and in one case, his boss, that presidential candidate, his son, a five-year investigation into very dubious conduct that everyone can see should have resulted in a felony, instead, after five-years results in misdemeanors. Whereas on the other hand, his boss’s primary political rival, it took seven months to come up with charges totaling 400 years,” Ratcliffe pondered.
Ratcliffe, who also once served as a lawmaker representing Texas, shared Gowdy’s skepticism.
The allegations raised against the Department now have potentially criminal and impeachable elements. As such, the authority of Congress to investigate is at its apex. Despite the opposition of the Democrats, the House must now act…https://t.co/JJwq72UpDU
— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) June 26, 2023
“The judge in this case shouldn’t accept the plea, because, as you know, judges are required to look at all of the defendant’s conduct. And in this case, you start with some of that conduct being on videotape and showing felony possession of a firearm while using a controlled substance, that’s a felony that carries a maximum penalty of ten years.” For starters.
“The judge is going to be aware of whistleblower testimony, that the very prosecutors in this case, according to the whistleblower, did more than exercise prosecutorial discretion, they obstructed parts of this investigation, including shutting down an investigation into a WhatsApp text message.”
That’s the one revealed by the House Ways and Means Committee that shows Hunter shaking down his Chinese contacts, saying his father was in the room and fuming. It broke loose the money they were expecting. Oversight Committee Chairman already filled us in on that transaction and more just like it.
