Organized Multi-State Ballot Harvesting Investigation

Harvesting

The ongoing saga that began in August with the revelation of condemning footage of 240 ballot traffickers dumping thousands of ballots into dropboxes in Georgia, during the 2020 Election is coming to a head. True the Vote and OPSEC Group who claim to have video of the 240 individuals in Georgia and another 202 in Arizona and are poised to release it soon, are meeting in Atlanta. The Gateway Pundit is calling the meeting the “Next Step” in the organized Multi-State Ballot Harvesting Investigation.

Not Just “Ballot Harvesting” Anymore,  It’s Ballot Trafficking

“According to John Fredericks state officials now have video of 240 leftist operatives he called “ballot traffickers” dumping tens of thousands of ballots into drop boxes in the middle of the night in locations across Georgia.”

Breitbart News reported in August that according to a document from True the Vote Founder, Catherine Engelbrecht the investigation will span several states in a comprehensive look into the dark world of ballot harvesting more accurately known as ballot trafficking.  They wrote,

“A document that the group’s founder Catherine Engelbrecht circulated to prospective donors, obtained by Breitbart News, details several facets of the investigation—which centers on what the group describes as the collection of cell phone GPS ping data in key election hotspots around the country including Georgia, Arizona, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Michigan.”

Real America’s Voice journalist Heather Mullins has been spearheading reporting on the investigation.

Here are the numbers they’re talking about:

  • 242 suspected ballot traffickers in Georgia
  • 202  suspected ballot traffickers in Arizona.
  • “According to the data, each trafficker went to an average of 23 ballot dropboxes.”
  •  True The Vote has obtained one full petabyte of surveillance footage on drop boxes
  • That’s about two million minutes of video
  • 73,000 individual video files

While several states are pressing forward with complex forensic audits which are incredibly important, the audits themselves are easily controversial and can be scrutinized and more easily maligned and attacked (see: Arizona). However, comprehensive video evidence that state ballot harvesting laws (ex. Arizona) and/or Election Consent agreements (ex. Georgia) have been in some cases BLATANTLY violated is far more compelling evidence that cannot be easily cast aside or scrutinized indefinitely in courtrooms. In short: they can be the smoking gun that audits’ findings, even especially damning ones usually can’t.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts