In recent years, the public has been questioning the influence and control that billionaire philanthropist Bill Gates has over society.
Is he trusted because of his billions or is something more sinister going on?
As it turns out, Gates owns more farmland in the United States than any other individual citizen – leading many to question why.
In an interview with MIT Technology Review, Gates suggested that wealthy nations should switch entirely to artificial beef while leaving real meat for poorer countries such as Africa.
This begs the question – why would someone like Bill push for something like synthetic meat when not even consuming it himself?
It appears that his true intentions are to control meat consumption by forcing livestock owners off their land and replacing it with “fake meat” – an idea which is both detrimental to our environment and poses a serious threat to human health as well.
Synthetic meats are made from animal cells in laboratories and lack essential nutrients required for healthy living, thus can cause long-term harm if consumed regularly.
So what motivates him?
It all comes down to money – lots and lots of money!
While we don’t know exactly what his motivations are behind advocating synthetics over real food sources, one thing is certain – greed plays a big part in this equation.
This raises further questions about who we entrust with such power and how this could lead us down a dangerous path if left unchecked.
This man is giving you health advice on what you should and should not eat!?
Telling you its healthier to eat his fake meat and to avoid real meat because its bad for you!! and oh he's also rigging the economy so it can only buy fake meat from him which he's heavily invested in! pic.twitter.com/5BRUVBu7uS
— Luke Rudkowski (@Lukewearechange) April 17, 2022
The fact that Bill Gates holds so much influence despite questionable motives leads us to wonder whether or not we’re giving him too much power without any oversight or accountability.
Could this be leading us down a dark path where individuals have no choice but to do as they are told?
Are there any limits on how far he can go before people start pushing back against these unethical practices designed only for monetary gain?
